Each application serves a distinct purpose — learning, contribution, validation, review, education delivery, internal insight, and external evaluation.
"Each application answers one primary question."
"How do real cloud decisions get documented?"
Provides: curated primary references, learning paths.
"How are realistic scenarios created?"
Provides: scenario authoring + editorial review.
"How are submissions evaluated by experienced engineers?"
Provides: structured human review, rubric-based feedback.
"How do you reason under constraints?"
Provides: submissions, review feedback, portfolio artifacts.
"How can a program teach decision-making using realistic briefs?"
Provides: cohort delivery model, instructor visibility, learner artifacts.
"How do teams decide, collectively?"
Provides: aggregated patterns, maturity themes, directional insights.
"How can companies evaluate candidates using realistic scenarios?"
Provides: scenario-based evaluation signals.
| Use Case | Solo | Authors | Reviews | Eng | Academy | Bench | Hire |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learn (references) | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| Create scenarios | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Human review | — | — | |||||
| Proof-of-work portfolio | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Education delivery | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Internal org insight | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| External evaluation | — | — | — | — | — | — |
*Reviewers can participate across multiple contexts, but the purpose changes.
| App | Visibility | Governance |
|---|---|---|
| Solo | Public | None |
| Authors | Curated | Editorial |
| Reviewers | Controlled | Ethics + Rubric |
| Engineer | User-controlled | Review Rules |
| Academy | Program-controlled | Partner Terms |
| Benchmark | Private (Org) | Ethical Safeguards |
| Hire | Scoped | Legal + Confidentiality |
Separation prevents conflict of interest in validation.
Learning is distinct from high-stakes assessment.
Hiring data remains pure and legally compliant.
Clear boundaries keep the ecosystem credible and useful.